A week before Thanksgiving, a Seattle-based group, Hanford Challenge, organized a meeting with a number of interested parties and stakeholder groups to discuss how to move forward in the dialogue on Hanford cleanup and plan a broadly based summit. The morning of the meeting, the Tri-City Herald ran an article framing this preliminary meeting as Western Washington vs. Eastern Washington, a significant setback to expanding and building trust between the participants. The issue with the article is that the Herald used Hanford Challenge's own words, taken directly from their website:
Western Washington and Portland are "concerned about Hanford's environmental impact past, present and future," the advocacy group says on its website.
Tri-City residents "are less concerned with environmental impacts," it said, and characterized Tri-City groups as focused on jobs and economic development.
"This polarization has interfered with the ability to hold a dialogue about the important issues facing the region when it comes to Hanford," the group said, describing Hanford environmental cleanup as "broken."
Ideally, the Hanford Summit will create a space for meaningful dialoge and will reinvigorate openness at Hanford. Much discussion is needed on an investment in sustainable, clean energy at Hanford tied to the cleanup mission and vision, for the benefit of the local and regional economy. The planning meeting had good participation from USDOE managment, the Washington Department of Ecology, the Environmental Protection Agency and a range of stakeholders.
And today, Tom Carpenter, the Executive Director of Hanford Challenge, has a guest editorial in the Tri-City Herald, arguing that everyone's interest in cleanup and protecting future generations is the basis for common ground.
Interestingly, the dialogue about the Hanford summit continues in the Tri-City Herald. An article on Wednesday (12/2/09) again asserts that Hanford Challenge & Tom Carpenter, its Executive Director are aiming at the wrong target.
ReplyDelete